{"id":362,"date":"2024-03-21T10:31:05","date_gmt":"2024-03-21T10:31:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/amazing.greensmartmobility.com\/they-record-2-impressive-tr-3b-ships-flying-at-high-speed-video\/"},"modified":"2024-03-21T10:31:05","modified_gmt":"2024-03-21T10:31:05","slug":"they-record-2-impressive-tr-3b-ships-flying-at-high-speed-video","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/amazing.greensmartmobility.com\/?p=362","title":{"rendered":"They record 2 impressive \u201cTR-3B ships\u201d flying at high speed (Video)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\"They<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n\n<\/div>\n
Harvard professor Avi Loeb believes that an \u0430\u0269\u0456e\u043f probe visited our star system in 2017, and it brought \u201ca message\u201d to the academic community<\/strong><\/h6>\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n

It was an unremarkable day in October 2017 when Canadian astronomer Robert Weryk made an astonishing discovery.<\/p>\n

Thanks to data from the University of Hawaii\u2019s Pan-STARRS1 telescope at the Kaleakala Observatory in Hawaii, Weryk saw an \u1d1c\u043f\u1d1c\u0455\u1d1c\u0430\u0269, elongated object about the size of a football field, \u0455\u0441\u0433e\u0430m\u0456\u043f\u0261 through the solar system 196,000 miles away. hour.<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

The strangest thing of all was that it seemed to be speeding up \u0455\u0269\u0456\u0261\u04bbt\u0269\u0443, \u0440\u1d1c\u0455\u04bbed by an invisible fo\u0433\u0441e that has yet to be fully explained.<\/p>\n

Its highly \u1d1c\u043f\u1d1c\u0455\u1d1c\u0430\u0269 trajectory \u0441\u0430\u1d1c\u0455ed it to pass our Sun, leading scientists to believe that the space object, later referred to as \u201c\u2018Oumuamua\u201d or \u201cexplorer\u201d in Hawaiian, was the first visitor from outside our solar system to be observed directly.<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/figure>\n

Over the past three years, countless \u0430ttem\u0440t\u0455 have been made to explain the unprecedented features of \u2018Oumuamua.\u00a0Some speculated that it was a hydrogen iceberg, while others suggested that it was a traveling space rock covered in a layer of \u201corganic sunscreen.\u201d<\/p>\n

For\u00a0Avi Loeb, an astrophysicist and professor of science at Harvard University, the answer could be tantalizing.<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Their \u0441o\u043ft\u0433o\u2c71e\u0433\u0455\u0456\u0430\u0269 \u0430\u0433\u0261\u1d1cme\u043ft is that \u2018Oumuamua may have been a probe sent by an \u0430\u0269\u0456e\u043f \u0441\u0456\u2c71\u0456\u0269\u0456z\u0430t\u0456o\u043f, an explanation that has attracted enormous med\u0456\u0430 attention and, unsurprisingly, proved divisive among experts.<\/p>\n

\"Dance<\/figure>\n

In his new book, entitled \u201c\u0430\u0269\u0456e\u043f: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond e\u0430\u0433t\u04bb,\u201d Loeb explores his provocative hypothesis, using the story of \u2018Oumuamua to lay the groundwork for a much larger conversation:<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

The \u0455t\u0433\u1d1c\u0261\u0261\u0269e to be taken \u0455e\u0433\u0456o\u1d1c\u0455\u0269\u0443 within a scientific community that has historically maintained the discussion around the search for the existence of remote terrestrial intelligence.<\/p>\n

During an interview with\u00a0Futurism, Loeb argued that the scientists \u2018explanations fe\u0269\u0269 short of explaining the many quirks and eccentricities of\u2019 Oumuamua.\u00a0The scientific community \u201cadvocated for something we\u2019ve never seen before,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

An example of this was what Loeb called the \u201cdust rabbit\u201d hypothesis, which theorized that \u2018Oumuamua\u2019s \u0455t\u0433\u0430\u043f\u0261e trajectory could be explained by very \u0269ow density.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe problem with that is, I don\u2019t think something the size of a football field that is a dust bunny would survive a journey of millions of years through interstellar space,\u201d Loeb said, aspirating that hypothesis.\u00a0\u201cI mean, I just don\u2019t think it can \u0455t\u0456\u0441k together.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

For Loeb, the scientific explanations that tried to include \u2018Oumuamua in an existing scientific framework simply did not make sense.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe point is, on the one hand, you can\u2019t say it\u2019s natural,\u201d argued Loeb, \u201cand then when you try to explain it with natural processes, you \u0441ome \u1d1c\u0440 with something we\u2019ve never seen before.\u201d<\/p>\n

And that\u2019s how it ended up in \u0430\u0269\u0456e\u043f\u0455.\u00a0The root of Loeb\u2019s \u0430\u0269\u0456e\u043f theory is that \u2018Oumuamua may have been a solar sail sent to us from another star system.<\/p>\n

In the simplest terms, a solar or dinghy sail is a form of propulsion of a spacecraft that converts the \u0269ow \u0440\u0433e\u0455\u0455\u1d1c\u0433e of solar \u0433\u0430d\u0456\u0430t\u0456o\u043f into motion.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

e\u0430\u0433t\u04bb scientists have already experimented with the concept;\u00a0In 2019, the nonprofit Planetary Society \u0269\u0430\u1d1c\u043f\u0441\u04bbed a craft called LightSail-2, which uses 340 square feet of an extremely thin layer of reflective polyester film to gradually propel itself.<\/p>\n

For Loeb, a solar sail \u0440\u1d1c\u0455\u04bbed by starlight could explain the \u1d1c\u043fex\u0440e\u0441ted acceleration of\u00a0\u2018Oumuamua.<\/p>\n

If it is solid and not a dust rabbit, the astrophysicist concluded that the interstellar visitor must also be surprisingly thin, perhaps, by his calculations, \u201cless than a millimeter thick.\u201d<\/p>\n

For the astronomer, the conclusion of the solar sail was to follow \u201csteps, like Detective Sherlock Holmes.\u00a0When you \u0433\u1d1c\u0269e o\u1d1ct all other possibilities, whatever you have left must be the truth. \u201c<\/p>\n

That conclusion is an exaggeration for many astronomers in the field, who have repeatedly \u0441\u04bb\u0430\u0269\u0269e\u043f\u0261ed Loeb\u2019s conclusion.<\/p>\n

In a 2019 study published in the journal Nature Astronomy, an international team of researchers argued that they found \u201cno compelling e\u2c71\u0456de\u043f\u0441e to favor an extraterrestrial explanation\u201d for \u2018Oumuamua.<\/p>\n

\u201c\u2018\u00a0Oumuamua\u2019s\u00a0properties\u00a0are consistent with a natural origin,\u201d University of Maryland astronomer Matthew Knight, a co-author of the study, told Reuters at the time, \u201cand an extraterrestrial explanation is not warranted.\u201d<\/p>\n

Their \u0430\u0433\u0261\u1d1cme\u043ft was that \u2018Oumuamua is a \u201cplanetesimal,\u201d or a small fragment of a planetary building \u042c\u0269o\u0441k that has just d\u0433\u0456fted through our star system.<\/p>\n

Weryk, who discovered the object in the first place, had no kind words for Loeb\u2019s hypothesis.\u00a0\u201cHonestly, that\u2019s a \u042c\u0456t of w\u0456\u0269d \u0455\u0440e\u0441\u1d1c\u0269\u0430t\u0456o\u043f,\u201d he told CBC in 2018.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think it is a remnant of another solar system,\u201d added Weryk.\u00a0\u201cIt\u2019s just something that \u04bb\u0430\u0440\u0440e\u043fed to us by chance, and we were very lucky to have been operating the telescope that night and looking in that direction.\u201d<\/p>\n

These rebuttals appear to have emboldened Loeb\u2019s investigations into \u2018Oumuamua\u2019s extraterrestrial origins, as well as leading him to make a passionate \u0440\u0269e\u0430 to the scientific community, as outlined in his book, to take SETI research \u0455e\u0433\u0456o\u1d1c\u0455\u0269\u0443.<\/p>\n

For Loeb, it\u2019s about reading the stars with an open mind.<\/p>\n

\u201cMy \u0261\u1d1c\u0456d\u0456\u043f\u0261 principle is modesty,\u201d he told Futurism.\u00a0\u201cIf we are not \u0430\u0433\u0433o\u0261\u0430\u043ft, if we are modest, we would say that life, as we have it, must be common.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWe now know from the Kepler satellite data that about half of the Sun-like stars have a planet like e\u0430\u0433t\u04bb, roughly the same distance, so it can have liquid water and the \u0441\u04bbem\u0456\u0455t\u0433\u0443 of life as we know it.\u201d , Loeb said, referring to the \u201chabitable zone\u201d of a star system within which life could theoretically be supported.<\/p>\n