{"id":1617,"date":"2025-03-01T08:54:57","date_gmt":"2025-03-01T08:54:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/amazing.greensmartmobility.com\/?p=1617"},"modified":"2025-03-01T08:54:58","modified_gmt":"2025-03-01T08:54:58","slug":"candace-owens-destroys-jessica-tarlov-she-cant-keep-up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/amazing.greensmartmobility.com\/?p=1617","title":{"rendered":"Candace Owens DESTROYS Jessica Tarlov \u2013 She Can\u2019t Keep Up!"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The latest episode of\u00a0The View<\/em>\u00a0turned into a political battleground when conservative commentator Candace Owens squared off with liberal analyst Jessica Tarlov, leaving viewers captivated by Owens\u2019 sharp, no-holds-barred critique. The debate, which centered on liberal feminism, immigration, and the direction of women\u2019s rights, quickly turned into a fiery exchange that had Owens calling out Tarlov and the left for what she deemed \u201cselective feminism.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It all began when Owens took aim at what she sees as the hypocrisy of liberal feminism. According to her, the left champions women\u2019s rights, but only when it aligns with their political agenda. Owens questioned why the left, which claims to advocate for women\u2019s empowerment, consistently overlooks conservative women like herself, despite their advocacy for traditional family values. She argued that liberal feminism only seems to care when it fits a narrative of political convenience, ignoring critical issues that don\u2019t align with their worldview.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Jessica Tarlov, a seasoned liberal voice, attempted to steer the conversation toward issues like healthcare and women\u2019s reproductive rights, pushing for government support to protect women\u2019s rights. She argued that cuts to healthcare services are directly harmful to women, particularly those from low-income backgrounds, and that such policies from the current administration are an attack on women\u2019s healthcare. However, Owens was quick to pivot, focusing on what she believes is the left\u2019s pattern of selective outrage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Owens delivered a sharp critique, saying, \u201cYou are attacking women, but you are not a feminist. You\u2019re out there, claiming to care about women\u2019s rights, but you conveniently ignore the issues that don\u2019t fit your narrative. This is about consistency, not about political convenience.\u201d Her words were a direct jab at Tarlov\u2019s liberal stance, and it was clear Owens came prepared to argue with depth and precision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Owens continued by addressing the left\u2019s outrage over family separations at the U.S.-Mexico border. She pointed out the disparity in how these same liberal voices fail to acknowledge the struggles of Black families in America, where the separation of families has been a systemic issue for decades due to factors like incarceration and poverty. \u201cThe Black community has been dealing with family separations for years, but no one is raising their voice about that,\u201d Owens asserted, challenging Tarlov\u2019s argument by highlighting what she saw as hypocrisy in liberal activism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tarlov, while defending liberal policies, found herself struggling to keep up with Owens\u2019 relentless points. She attempted to bring the discussion back to healthcare, claiming that women\u2019s reproductive rights are under attack by the current administration. But Owens wasn\u2019t backing down, swiftly turning the conversation back to the inconsistency of the left\u2019s outrage and its selective activism. \u201cYou can\u2019t stand here and call yourself a feminist when you don\u2019t support conservative women who hold different views,\u201d Owens fired back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The debate was a stark reflection of the deep ideological divide between the two sides. Tarlov\u2019s attempt to redirect the conversation to more traditional liberal issues like women\u2019s healthcare was met with Owens\u2019 challenge of liberal double standards on issues of race and gender. Tensions ran high, and Owens\u2019 focused, unapologetic delivery left Tarlov visibly flustered at times.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The conversation ended with Owens underscoring her point: that the left\u2019s version of feminism is only inclusive when it supports their political agenda, and that this selective approach undermines true progress for women. \u201cIf you really care about women, you have to support all women, not just the ones who fit your political mold,\u201d she concluded.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As the debate wrapped up, it was clear that Owens had successfully dominated the discussion, leaving Tarlov struggling to keep up. Owens\u2019 criticisms not only highlighted the inconsistencies in liberal activism but also challenged the very foundation of how feminism is defined and practiced in today\u2019s political climate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This confrontation left viewers with a lot to think about, as Owens\u2019 criticisms of liberal hypocrisy resonated with many, while Tarlov\u2019s defense of progressive policies seemed to fall short of convincing the audience. The episode sparked heated conversations on social media, with fans of Owens praising her for her quick-witted responses and well-prepared arguments, while others expressed frustration with what they saw as a missed opportunity for meaningful dialogue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Whether you agree with Owens\u2019 views or not, one thing is certain: her bold, fearless approach to the debate left a lasting impression, and this showdown between Owens and Tarlov is sure to be remembered as one of the most intense moments in The View<\/em>\u2018s recent history.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The latest episode of\u00a0The View\u00a0turned into a political battleground when conservative commentator Candace Owens squared off with liberal analyst Jessica Tarlov, leaving viewers captivated by […]<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1618,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rank_math_lock_modified_date":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1617","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/amazing.greensmartmobility.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1617","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/amazing.greensmartmobility.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/amazing.greensmartmobility.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amazing.greensmartmobility.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amazing.greensmartmobility.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1617"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/amazing.greensmartmobility.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1617\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1619,"href":"https:\/\/amazing.greensmartmobility.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1617\/revisions\/1619"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amazing.greensmartmobility.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1618"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/amazing.greensmartmobility.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1617"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amazing.greensmartmobility.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1617"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amazing.greensmartmobility.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1617"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}